天美麻豆

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

The Virginia Board of Education took another step on Friday to clarify how schools will be rated and student performance measured to better determine how to direct state resources.

The board, on the superintendent鈥檚 recommendation, approved : 鈥淒istinguished,鈥� 鈥淥n Track,鈥� 鈥淥ff Track鈥� and 鈥淣eeds Intensive Support.鈥�

Schools considered 鈥渄istinguished鈥� are those that exceed the state鈥檚 expectations for growth, achievement, and readiness, while 鈥渘eeds intensive support鈥� schools are those that 鈥渟ignificantly鈥� do not meet any of the state鈥檚 expectations.

The 鈥渙n-track鈥� and 鈥渙ff track鈥� descriptors mean schools are either meeting or not meeting expectations. However, questions surfaced on where the terms came from, the benchmarks, and the descriptions behind the labels.

Under the proposed plan, Virginia will begin collecting data for the new performance framework starting in August. Results will be released during the 2025-26 school year.

Board President Grace Creasey, a Gov. Glenn Youngkin appointee, said the department will do more work to flush out the descriptions as the revision of the state鈥檚 accreditation system moves forward.

鈥淚 would like to remind us that the purpose here is transparency and understanding on behalf of not just people in schools, not just those of us sitting here in this room, not people who do education every day,鈥� said Creasey on Friday. 鈥淭his is for people to understand who are parents and families; and so while we鈥檙e deciding what the main categories are, these descriptors have yet to be fully baked at this point.鈥�

Earlier in the process of revising the accreditation system, the board considered two different measures to track academic performance: an achievement index and an overall school rating, which raised concerns about the potential impact on low-performing schools and efforts to recruit teachers and influencing parents to seek other school choices for their children.

Since April, teachers, parents, students, and education leaders have told the board they support using category descriptions instead of an A-F rating scale.

The category descriptors are part of a larger plan by Youngkin鈥檚 administration to overhaul the existing accountability system, which focuses on accreditation and measures schools based on academic achievement, performance gaps, student attendance and graduation and dropout rates, and factors like building safety, student-teacher ratios and licensure.

Schools are then labeled accredited, accredited with conditions or not accredited.

Members of the administration and the board have criticized the current system for being vague and failing to address declines in student performance in subjects such as math and reading.

The administration鈥檚 process includes splitting up the state鈥檚 accreditation system into two parts: an accreditation system, to assess whether schools meet all requirements laid out in state laws and regulations; and an accountability system, to provide 鈥渢imely and transparent information on student and school performance.鈥�

Under the new system, schools will be rated based on students鈥� success, measured by their mastery of subjects and academic growth.

Stakeholders and the board are split on the weight factors totaling the overall score for each school level.

Earlier the board expressed that 鈥渕astery鈥� is important to make sure students thoroughly understand the concepts before graduating to the next grade level. Others have urged the board to keep 鈥渕astery鈥� and 鈥済rowth鈥� at an equal weight.

The overall score for elementary schools consists of three weight factors: 65% mastery, 25% growth, and 10% readiness.

In middle schools, the performance score is weighted 60% mastery, 20% growth and 20% readiness; high schools鈥� performance score is weighted 50% mastery, 35% readiness and 15% graduation.

VDOE staff said the performance descriptors would be in addition to the three federally required support and improvement identification categories: Comprehensive, Targeted and Additional Targeted. The designations are given to schools because a specific group of students may need assistance in catching up to the instruction.

Schools identified as 鈥渃omprehensive鈥� receive full federal support for the entire school, compared to 鈥渢argeted鈥� schools, which receive support for low-performing subgroups.

鈥淭his is all about providing a holistic picture to the public that鈥檚 more transparent, more clear about where schools are performing across all the indicators in the system,鈥� said Anne Hyslop, director of policy development for All4Ed.

Last year, the department contracted with Hyslop to work on changes to the accreditation system along with Chad Aldeman, the Edunomics Lab policy director at Georgetown University.

Board member Anne Holton, former state secretary of education and an appointee of Democratic Govs. Terry McAuliffee and Ralph Northam, was the lone vote against accepting the recommendation, saying she needed more information about the descriptors.

鈥淭here are at least a dozen significant decisions, including one of the most important decisions of these 鈥榳here the lines are going to be drawn鈥� that we haven鈥檛 made yet, even though we鈥檙e implementing the system starting with the school year that starts in six weeks,鈥� Holton said.

She added that she鈥檚 concerned that the proposed accreditation system has not been 鈥渇ully thought out鈥� and will have 鈥渦nintended consequences鈥� on teachers, families and 鈥渙ur neediest students.鈥�

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: [email protected]. Follow Virginia Mercury on and .

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how The 74鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.